Saturday, May 16, 2009

Why no follow-up on the "insurance issue involving Danny Gans and his deal with Encore at Wynn Las Vegas"?


The day after this news organization revealed that editors and reporters at the Las Vegas Review-Journal were deliberately holding back information about what may have caused the death of local superstar Danny Gans at the age of 52, the paper responded with three Gans news items after days without any coverage of the city's biggest mystery in years.

One of the items published Thursday, a one-liner in Norm Clarke's entertainment column, was a teaser that in any other major city with competing newspapers and several local television newsrooms would lead to front page news:

"No one's willing to discuss it, but there's an insurance issue involving Danny Gans and his deal with Encore at Wynn Las Vegas that suggests Gans had concerns about his health."

So why has no one at the Las Vegas Review-Journal or any other Las Vegas media outlet followed up on this bombshell?



No comments:

Post a Comment